Find the latest press releases, brand assets and media information.
iGaming operators take card deposits around the clock, from players who expect instant play — which puts card anti-fraud software directly in the path of one of the fastest-growing fraud patterns in the industry: a stolen card used to fund an account, followed immediately by play and a withdrawal request before anyone notices the card was never the player's.
Crypto platforms that accept card deposits sit at one of the highest-fraud-risk points in the industry — a stolen card, used to buy crypto, converts a reversible card transaction into an irreversible on-chain transfer within minutes. Card anti-fraud software for crypto platforms exists specifically to catch that pattern before the conversion happens, because once the crypto moves, there's no chargeback that gets it back.
A bank's card portfolio is the fastest-moving part of its fraud exposure — thousands of authorizations a minute, each one needing a yes/no decision before the transaction completes. Card anti-fraud software is the layer that makes that call: scoring every card transaction for fraud risk in real time, before authorization, not after the chargeback arrives. For banks, it sits next to AML transaction monitoring but answers a different question — not "is this money laundering," but "is this actually the cardholder."
A payment provider processes card transactions for merchants who live and die on conversion — which means card anti-fraud software has to do two things most fraud tools treat as contradictory: catch the fraud, and let the vast majority of legitimate transactions through without friction. For PSPs and EMIs, fraud prevention software isn't a back-office compliance tool — it's part of the checkout experience itself.
[Payment service providers](https://finchecker.eu/industries/payments-industry)move money across jurisdictions in real time. Every new merchant and customer introduces compliance obligations that require continuous sanctions screening and customer risk assessment. PEP & sanctions screening enables PSPs to detect sanctioned individuals, politically exposed persons and high-risk entities before transactions occur.
Crypto exchanges operate in one of the fastest-changing regulatory environments. Under frameworks such as MiCA and FATF Recommendation 16, virtual asset service providers (VASPs) must identify high-risk customers before transactions take place. PEP & sanctions screening helps exchanges detect sanctioned individuals, politically exposed persons and high-risk wallets before onboarding and throughout the customer lifecycle.
Telecommunications providers increasingly operate regulated financial services including digital wallets, SIM registration and mobile money platforms. As these services expand, telecom operators face AML obligations similar to those of financial institutions. PEP & sanctions screening helps verify whether customers or businesses appear on sanctions lists or politically exposed person databases before regulated services are activated.
Financial crime risks in iGaming extend far beyond customer onboarding. Every new player introduces regulatory obligations that include identity verification, AML checks, sanctions screening, ongoing monitoring and risk assessment. PEP & sanctions screening helps operators identify whether a customer appears on international sanctions lists, politically exposed person (PEP) databases or global watchlists before financial relationships begin and throughout the customer lifecycle. Modern watchlist screening software has become a core component of every AML compliance program because regulatory expectations continue to increase across Europe and other regulated jurisdictions.
Banks process thousands of customer relationships every day, each carrying potential AML and regulatory risk. Before opening an account or approving a financial relationship, institutions must verify whether a customer appears on international sanctions lists, politically exposed person (PEP) databases or global watchlists. PEP & sanctions screening is a core element of modern AML compliance. It enables banks to identify high-risk customers, comply with FATF Recommendations, EU AML legislation and local supervisory requirements while reducing unnecessary manual investigations.
Finchecker is now listed on Whitelabels.io, a leading directory where businesses research and compare white-label, AML compliance, KYC software, KYB verification, Identity Verification (IDV), Transaction Monitoring, Fraud Prevention, RegTech, fintech, payment and iGaming solution providers. An increasing number of financial institutions, payment service providers (PSPs), electronic money institutions (EMIs), crypto businesses, iGaming and betting operators, mobile operators and telecom providers, fintech businesses begin their search for trusted AML software, KYC providers, compliance platforms and customer onboarding solutions through specialised industry directories. Being present where compliance decision-makers are already evaluating vendors makes it easier for prospective clients to discover Finchecker and compare our capabilities.
Crypto transactions move fast, cross borders instantly, and don't come with a compliance officer built in. Transaction monitoring in AML for crypto businesses means tracking not just the transaction itself, but the flow around it — where funds came from, where they're going, which wallets and counterparties they touch, and whether any of that intersects with a sanctions list. It's the same core discipline as banking AML, run on a rail that was never designed with a compliance layer in mind.
Ask a bank what transaction monitoring is for, and the answer is regulatory: catch dirty money before it moves. Ask a payment provider, and there's a second answer sitting right behind it: don't kill good transactions while you're at it. AML transaction monitoring for payment providers is the same core discipline — continuously screening transactions for suspicious patterns — but it runs inside a business where every extra second of review has a price tag. A PSP or EMI doesn't just need to catch fraud. It needs to do it without adding friction to the transactions that are completely legitimate.
